STEWART COPELAND

by **Kirk** on 27 Jun 2007 19:58

Eh, eh !!!!

I turn to you this question !

by **phaty** on 27 Jun 2007 20:18

NO LUTE???

:shock:

by **Kirk** on 27 Jun 2007 20:24

No "Blue turtles" ????

by **georgygirl** on 27 Jun 2007 20:40

No Orchestralli...

:cry:

by **giovanni** on 28 Jun 2007 16:20

No Gizmo...
No Green Chimneys...
No Brand New Day...

Thanks for waiting so long guys!

Giovanni

by **georgygirl** on 28 Jun 2007 17:17

Ouch!

Just imagine no Oysterhead!

:shock:

I am with you Gio, being thankful with our lovely trio for waiting so long.

:wink:

by **Kirk** on 29 Jun 2007 00:22

I started an intresting post, I think....

How many things lost without the separation!

So, we can say that groups that stay "together" are losing things!!!!

Destiny's played good cards for our guys.... since there were a man, his wife, his little son with their chair of wicker, moving with their little car from Newcastle to London, to meet the best drummer in the world!!!!

by **matthewstr** on 29 Jun 2007 00:39

On the other hand, we might have lost "Roxanne '97". Speaking of which, by my caculations it's the 10th anniversary of Roxanne '97, which is probably why they are celebrating with this tour. No?

by **giovanni** on 29 Jun 2007 20:31

and I have to say that maybe....there was no SC.net...

by **English-lion** on 29 Jun 2007 22:58

No Rhythmatist

by **Mister Gradenko** on 30 Jun 2007 09:02

but there would still be tube socks right?

by **phaty** on 30 Jun 2007 10:09

[quote="Mister Gradenko"]but there would still be tube socks right?[/quote]

By now even Sting would wear them ... !

Okay maybe not.

STEWART COPELAND

How many solo works LOST in an earlier reunion ????

How many solo works LOST in an earlier reunion ????

No Gizmo

maybe

Who is online