Daily Mail is indeed a rather shit newspaper.
The Guardian isn't. One may disagree with it's editorial policy, but it doesn't print gossipy bullshit. http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/ ... uzbekistan
If the funds raised, and the fee, have been put to good use then that is definitely a point in the gentleman's favour. I appreciate that there are differing views on 'cultural boycotts' and therefore let's let that slide. However, how does a person think that they're performing for UNICEF if UNICEF know nothing about it? Maybe it's a muddle. Maybe there was no large fee paid for the performance. Maybe Sting did not profit at all from this. In which case, I think it might be in his best interests to issue a press release setting the record straight.