Influential Drummer Bracketology: Stewart 2nd only to BRich

Influential Drummer Bracketology: Stewart 2nd only to BRich

Postby DirtyMartini on 26 May 2009 17:44

(Amazing the stuff one finds when searching for something completely different.)

Posted in 2007, some folks of unknown provenance determine which drummer has had the most influence on modern popular music:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/allspaw/1205361487/

(Do note that they did forget to include Krupa, Baker, and Animal in the running.)

Amusing comment:

[quote]as for copeland hes a bit of an ass but i beleive him to have had more influence over the shaping of moden music than most.[/quote]
Dramatic highlights & a unique musical cosmos. Guaranteed.
User avatar
DirtyMartini
 
Posts: 9622
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 18:38
Location: Around.

Postby TheEqualizer on 26 May 2009 18:22

When first reading this post, I thought this overstated Stewart's case a bit. However, when looking how this conclusion was arrived at, I think, based on this essentially arbitrary format, the result is fairly valid. I think some would be interesting to see that Stewart knocked out Peart and then Bonzo in successive rounds.

I think Rich had a much easier bracket than Stewart.

Also, if the question is solely influence, I find it hard to pick Weinberg over Ringo. You may think Max is a better drummer, but more influential? Not by a long shot. I also question Gadd over Moon. Gadd is fantastic, but more influential? I find that hard to believe.
There is no bigger gong.
User avatar
TheEqualizer
 
Posts: 9702
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 21:34
Location: Waaayy Growth

Postby DirtyMartini on 27 May 2009 13:50

Yeah, the methodology is flawed as hell and some of the results are pretty questionable. Rich barely even competes really. More than the results, I'd be really curious to hear some of the conversation and argument that went into the decisions made.

I'm with you on Ringo v. Weinberg; with Gadd v. Moon, though, I dunno. There is no definition of "modern popular music" provided, so what exactly these drummers are said to have an influence on is hard to say and makes a difference in my mind. If the endgame is, say, Slipknot, then okay, my money's on Moon. But Gadd's resume is so ridiculously long and varied -- I mean, damn: http://www.drstevegadd.com/discography.htm -- that in the 70s especially, it seems you couldn't turn on your radio w/o running into him. In addition to being straight-up talented, he has had a hand in just so much -- especially so much popular, radio-played music whose sound was then imitated -- I can easily see an argument that he helped shape the sound of a genre. But again, as "modern popular music" goes, well, depends on what we mean by that.
Dramatic highlights & a unique musical cosmos. Guaranteed.
User avatar
DirtyMartini
 
Posts: 9622
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 18:38
Location: Around.

Postby zilboy on 27 May 2009 15:25

Neil's a great rock drummer, but even after lessons with Peter Erskine and countless hours with Freddy Gruber, the guy still cannot swing!

Stewart can swing and rock at the same time.

Krupa, Rich, and Ringo gave drumming a face,
Moon, Bonham, and Peart gave drumming a war cry,
Gadd gave drumming dancing shoes,
and Copeland launched drumming into the future.

My two cents.

P.S. Polls/rankings are silly :roll:
User avatar
zilboy
 
Posts: 1030
Joined: 07 Jan 2006 18:42

Postby DirtyMartini on 28 May 2009 01:43

Well said, zilboy. Very well said.
Dramatic highlights & a unique musical cosmos. Guaranteed.
User avatar
DirtyMartini
 
Posts: 9622
Joined: 03 Mar 2007 18:38
Location: Around.


Return to THE KRYPTON FORUM

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests