Star Trek

Postby Throb on 08 May 2009 16:57

Dive, hope you are OK with all the storms.
We have a very bad fire about 35 miles north in Santa Barbara. Very hot and dry, not good.
Have we got touchdown
User avatar
Throb
 
Posts: 1162
Joined: 13 Jul 2007 02:47
Location: 1983

Postby GinaSuperCat on 08 May 2009 23:00

[quote="Throb"]
Geek is IN
Woooo Hooooo![/quote]

Yessssss, I <3 it when were back 'in'...Pcat and I likely seeing this tomorrow!!!
MMMMEEEEEOOOOOOWWWWWW!!!!
User avatar
GinaSuperCat
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: 31 Jan 2007 22:59
Location: President: Special Anthony Fan Club

Postby SambucaSubaru on 09 May 2009 01:27

I saw it, too, and it is [b]excellent![/b] All the humor of the original, with the production values of the later series, and great casting. If you're even remotely a Trek fan, you'll love it.


S.S.
User avatar
SambucaSubaru
 
Posts: 127
Joined: 08 Nov 2007 15:00
Location: America's Dairyland!

Postby Divemistress of the Dark on 09 May 2009 02:40

JESUS X. CHRIST IN A HANDCAR. It was *stupendous*. That kid they have playing Spock deserves an Oscar. I'm nearly serious.

OK, I'm gonna have to sit on my hands not to type spoilers, but the only complaint I have is that some of it is shot with a very shaky cam, and I got a little seasick. But overall, I loved it so much I'm gonna go see it again ASAP, hopefully at the local IMAX.

*is still just blown away*
*loved it loved it*
*agrees with others that it paid proper homage to the original(s) and yet was all its own creation*

p.s. thanks SS. We've had tornado watches all day, including one that's still active. You know what....I'm just gonna have to adopt a more laissez-faire attitude about it. You just can't stop living your life, and when there are storms and watches just about every day....

Well, let's just say I now have one of these jobbies.

http://www.amazon.com/FR150-Solar-Power ... 848&sr=8-7

Unless I hear the storm is imminent and there's either huge hail or a funnel on the ground within about 20 miles of my house, I'm just gonna try to get past it. This shit has to end someday....doesn't it?!
On Google - site:stewartcopeland.net "your keyword here" - thanks DM!!
User avatar
Divemistress of the Dark
 
Posts: 7873
Joined: 12 Jul 2006 14:10
Location: Nashville, TN

Postby Throb on 09 May 2009 04:24

Wow. So you liked it Dive? :? :lol:


Must. Get. To. Theater.


Plot a course Mr. Sulu.

Engage

Resistance is futile.
Have we got touchdown
User avatar
Throb
 
Posts: 1162
Joined: 13 Jul 2007 02:47
Location: 1983

Postby Rancid Date on 09 May 2009 12:57

~ And she can hang around 'til late. Oh boy! ~
User avatar
Rancid Date
 
Posts: 299
Joined: 24 Feb 2008 16:11
Location: South Florida

Postby English-lion on 09 May 2009 14:31

I heard that William Shatner is a little upset about not being in the movie

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fu656gG ... r_embedded
User avatar
English-lion
 
Posts: 2782
Joined: 04 Jun 2007 04:33
Location: Montreal

Postby SambucaSubaru on 09 May 2009 14:38

[quote="English-lion"]I heard that William Shatner is a little upset about not being in the movie[/quote]


From an interview with the director:

"William Shatner, who played Captain Kirk in the original series and in seven of the subsequent movies, was not interested in taking a cameo role but wanted a larger part. "One of the problems was that Captain Kirk had been killed off in the seventh Star Trek movie and we didn't know how to bring him back because we wanted to honour the canon of Star Trek." Shatner declined an offer to meet with his successor, 28-year-old Chris Pine, who plays the young Kirk, but wrote him a letter wishing him well."

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/film ... rview.html


S.S.
User avatar
SambucaSubaru
 
Posts: 127
Joined: 08 Nov 2007 15:00
Location: America's Dairyland!

Postby Dietmar on 09 May 2009 15:04

the reason that the movie doesn't have to follow the established Star Trek canon is the same reason that would have allowed Shatner / fat Kirk to come back

don't want to spoil anything by mentioning the reason

Dietmar
User avatar
Dietmar
 
Posts: 1728
Joined: 14 May 2005 07:36
Location: at work ...

Postby sockii on 09 May 2009 15:17

[quote="Dietmar"]the reason that the movie doesn't have to follow the established Star Trek canon is the same reason that would have allowed Shatner / fat Kirk to come back[/quote]

True (and LOL). It's a very clever way to change the canon without pissing off all the old fans (for the most part).
User avatar
sockii
 
Posts: 4888
Joined: 05 May 2005 02:05
Location: Mercy Street

Postby English-lion on 09 May 2009 15:36

:lol: *sinker* :lol: did you click the link I posted :?: :lol:

I was tongue and cheek :wink:
User avatar
English-lion
 
Posts: 2782
Joined: 04 Jun 2007 04:33
Location: Montreal

Postby Bry on 09 May 2009 23:10

~I entertain my Rancid Date~
User avatar
Bry
 
Posts: 180
Joined: 09 May 2008 17:50
Location: South Florida!

Postby TheEqualizer on 10 May 2009 01:26

LOVED the movie. LOVED. IT. 5/5 on the EQ meter. Sure to please any hardcore Star Trek fan, and I suspect non-fans will enjoy it pretty much as well. Funny. Great action. Well paced. Very good story. The casting is spot on. I was quite concerned about the casting of Simon Pegg as Scotty, but he was terrific. I personally liked Dr. McCoy quite a bit. Great ensemble from Sulu to Chekhov to Uhuru (pant pant) to . . . well, everyone.
There is no bigger gong.
User avatar
TheEqualizer
 
Posts: 9702
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 21:34
Location: Waaayy Growth

Postby Divemistress of the Dark on 10 May 2009 02:05

Ha! Yep. Personally I wouldn't have expected myself to regard Spock as an object of hotness, but sweet Jesus, you can hardly help yourself. I think I'm still mopping up drool. ;)

I read yesterday in WashPost that Shatner wasn't in the flick because his agent held out for more money. Read & weep:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/co ... 03669.html

Figured the weak point would be J.J. Abrams' tendencies toward all flash w/no substance and assumed the storyline would be asinine...but after having read early reviews I went into this thing with pretty high expectations. Even then, what can I say - the flick pretty well had me in its thrall within the first few seconds due to some clever Foley work.

OK, still no spoilers. Come on, kids - go see it so we can talk about it ;)

You know, I didn't recognize Karl Urban for the first ten minutes of onscreen time. He did a great! job. I'll agree the quality of the acting was the film's major strength.

Gonna go see it on IMAX one night this week...and just preordered the new Blu-Ray release of all the prior ST flicks, that's coming out Tuesday....(already own the full Original Trek series on DVD natch ;))
On Google - site:stewartcopeland.net "your keyword here" - thanks DM!!
User avatar
Divemistress of the Dark
 
Posts: 7873
Joined: 12 Jul 2006 14:10
Location: Nashville, TN

Postby njperry on 10 May 2009 02:56

Mrs njp and I saw it today and just loved it!

What a great mix of honoring the past while having a plot and characters you care about based on now, not the past. Plus a great deal of humor without veering into parody (although it came close a few times). A great balancing act is really what this does.

Now we are big fans of Trek. A sign of that is that we have seen probably the worst episode of the original series, Spock's Brian, several times. So we can from a dedicated fan perspective.

This movie is right up there with the best of the Trek movies such as Wrath of Khan and First Contact.
SC-There are a few crazy people on this planet. Sure sign of that is that they kinda like my music
User avatar
njperry
 
Posts: 2512
Joined: 25 Feb 2008 23:42
Location: Never too young for Stewart soundtracks

PreviousNext

Return to THE KRYPTON FORUM

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests