by GinaSuperCat on 05 Mar 2009 15:06
I posted a reference to BHL's statement about animal care and the measures they are taking way long ago earlier in this thread when this was first raised, which they obviously thought about and made sure to address in advance.
I'll type it here in its entirety, for measure:
****
"There are a variety of animals involved in Ben Hur Live. As well as horses for the chariot race, there are current plans to include camels, birds of prey, donkeys and goats. Like the human actors we consider the animals to be performers in the show -- they are part of the action and enrich the event.
"For us as the producer, this brings great responsibility: the proper care and protection of the animals is of the utmost priority, appropriate to each individual animal and its integrity. We demand respectful and caring treatment of the animals from everyone involved in this production and guarantee species appropriate care arrangements.
"Their accommodation, transport, transport, and participation in the show will be made as stress free as possible. To ensure this, we have been in close contact with recognized animal experts and trainers since planning began. They advise us on the best way to manage accommodation, transport, and performances.
"Furthermore, we will establish a partnership with an independent animal rights group, providing them with full and unlimited access during rehearsals and on tour so that they can work as external observers.
"We feel deeply committed to an ethical attitude towards the whole creation"
***
Is there some reason why we should be concerned with the measures they are taking or discount their statements about their concern for the animals where they claim to treat them as well as the actors? Or is the objection just to performing animals in general, irregardless of the above attempt at addressing the problem.
The reason why I am asking these questions is because this conversation invariably IS going to be viewed as a personal attack, for if the show is being ethically questioned then whoever is going is implicated in the process and will feel they have to defend themselves from charges of insensitivity to animals. And also Stewart himself. A blanket criticism of the endeavor is, regardless if you mean it that way or not or not, going to question those involved or going, who include people who are so very concerned about animals and their treatment, like I know Dietmar, for example, to be.
So if we are indeed going to discuss this, we should take the above statement about animal protection into consideration in the conversation. At least we shouldn't pretend that the BHL production didn't already address this concern rather extensively in advance.
Just my 2c, best wishes all--GSC
MMMMEEEEEOOOOOOWWWWWW!!!!