Oh Tee: So that all of us cannot be luddites anymore...
Posted:
11 Mar 2009 17:06
by TOWOS
For my dear luddite lady and the ones who still are trying to find their way in the texting- socialinteractionsites-messaging-seeping into email-jungle:
http://www.webopedia.com/quick_ref/text ... ations.asp
While perusing it, I found out that EGADS! (used by our Dearest Flagmistress) is not there...WOW! I often wondered what that one was about.
Re: Oh Tee: So that all of us cannot be luddites anymore...
Posted:
11 Mar 2009 19:24
by animal
[quote="TOWOS"]For my dear luddite lady and the ones who still are trying to find their way in the texting- socialinteractionsites-messaging-seeping into email-jungle:
http://www.webopedia.com/quick_ref/text ... ations.asp
While perusing it, I found out that EGADS! (used by our Dearest Flagmistress) is not there...WOW! I often wondered what that one was about.
[/quote]
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/egad
Main Entry: egad
Pronunciation: \i-ˈgad\
Variant(s): or egads \-ˈgadz\
Function: interjection
Etymology: probably euphemism for oh God
Date: 1673
—used as a mild oath
Posted:
11 Mar 2009 19:32
by TOWOS
Thanks, animal! As I saw EGADS always in capital letters, I thought of it as an acronym or one of the text abbreviations.
Posted:
12 Mar 2009 04:01
by luddite lady
Thanks for the link TOWOS. But that's way too much lingo for my brain to absorb. It still makes a useful reference should I ever want to stop being clueless.
EGADS, on the other hand, I totally get. I'm sure I use that more often than OMG. I suppose there was too much Oscar Wilde in my youth and not enough microchips.
Posted:
12 Mar 2009 04:11
by DirtyMartini
Haha. Yeah, sorry, T. I came pretty close to doctoring in 19th century poetry, so "egad" and "indeed" have about the same weight in my brain as "dude" and "awesome." Occupational hazard of sorts. I'm aware of the oddness.
Thanks for the defining, animal.