by jedsoon on 21 Sep 2006 06:07
i'm a star wars geek too, so let me explain:
the three original star wars movies came out in the late '70s and early '80s. in 1997, lucas released new versions of the movies, with updated effects and some other elements altered, added, or deleted. in 2004, he did it again with even newer versions, which built on the changes from '97. now the original theatrical versions have finally been released as bonus features to the revised versions.
a lot of longtime fans are put off or even outraged by the new versions, as they prefer the movies they remember from their childhood. now, i really admire george lucas-- he is at least equal to stewart in terms of his effect on me as an artist. but even i disagree with some of the changes. my biggest objection was the removal of some of the music from return of the jedi. i don't necessarily despise what was put in place of it, but i do believe the original music was better.
the biggest changes that most diehard fans have issues with are the changes to story. in the new versions of a new hope, greedo shoots at han point blank from across a table and misses, followed by han blasting his enemy. in the original version, greedo doesn't shoot at all. fans object to the change as a knee-jerk pc reactionary bit of skullduggery, claiming that it completely alters han's rogueish character that he let his assassin get a shot off first, especially after he has just announced to han that he's come to kill him. i'm inclined to agree. but my big issue is how the heck does greedo miss at point blank range?
in the newest version of return of the jedi, the actor that portrays anakin's force ghost has been replaced with the actor that played anakin in the most recent two pictures. lucas justifies this by explaining that anakin had reverted to the form he had before turning to the dark side. perhaps this is true, but darth vader's final act was saving his son luke from the machinations of the emporer, which means he actually died while embracing the light side of the force. a more plausible explanation is that if you sit and watch all six films in a row, it may be more of an emotional impact to see the actor we now most closely associate with the anakin role to take his place beside obi-wan and yoda in jedi heaven. i'm not terribly offended by the new version, but either way is fine with me.
i'm pretty sure any new version of the rhythmatist would be vastly different from the original. my point above is that both versions can co-exist side by side in the same release. and stew doesn't even have to worry about negative fan reaction because most people have never even seen the original!
-chris