Page 1 of 1
the best Whisky photo - spot the difference
Posted:
06 Mar 2007 08:45
by New Zealand Promoter
http://www.mlk.com/presse/police/livein ... Images.jpg
thanks, dietmar!
- but who photoshopped andy's face...?
spot the difference:
http://www.smh.com.au/ffximage/2007/02/ ... x338,0.jpg
i know andy has a bit of 'turkey jowl' happening, but he is 64! i think we can all handle 'the truth'....
Posted:
06 Mar 2007 14:05
by Greg Moonspank
HA! Andy + Photoshop = a happy manager I guess.
Posted:
06 Mar 2007 19:21
by Mrs. Gradenko
The only differences I've noticed is one is now my wallpaper, and the other is smaller.
Andy's face looks the same in both...
Posted:
06 Mar 2007 20:22
by Dietmar
someone smoothed out the skin below Andy's face...
Posted:
06 Mar 2007 20:24
by GinaSuperCat
ok, ok heh I'll probably have my face 'photoshopped' at 64 too if I manage that long...but the pic rocks, big time...look at Stewart /giggle!
Posted:
06 Mar 2007 20:40
by jennym
does sting have shoes on? if yes, what kind? you can see his ankles and part of his feet. man, these guys can rock. you see the love and the intensity. i can hardly wait to see and feel their vibe. WOW!
Posted:
06 Mar 2007 20:47
by zilboy
Just like the old days.
Posted:
06 Mar 2007 20:48
by jennym
okay, i'm a big duffus! after getting my face up to the screen i see that it is not sting's feet i see but an audience member's wrists and hands up in the air! it is crazy but it looks like they align with sting's legs.
okay, i better get back to work.
Posted:
06 Mar 2007 21:09
by New Zealand Promoter
[quote="Mrs. Gradenko"]The only differences I've noticed is one is now my wallpaper, and the other is smaller.
Andy's face looks the same in both...[/quote]
oh! time for some new spectacles perhaps? look at andy's face - particularly the lower part. you'll notice that in the smaller (untouched) version, there is a strange, amorphous blob of flesh piled beneath his chin which seems to be attacking him. These folds of rubbery skin are - quite obviously, actually - missing from the large image. you can also see that the part of andy's chin that had been doctores has not been carefully photoshopped. the person who dod the 'job' failed to correctly add grain, texture to the section to match the rest of the image.
Posted:
06 Mar 2007 22:12
by Hannaha
It's a bit of a poor retouch, but that's not the point is it? Why is the mass media so terrified of letting us see people age? Why can't we be allowed to see our heroes growing older? Is it really so terrible? Honestly, when is the western world going to get over its obsession with 'youth = beauty = success'?
Posted:
07 Mar 2007 00:21
by michelle
[quote="jennym"]does sting have shoes on? if yes, what kind? you can see his ankles and part of his feet. man, these guys can rock. you see the love and the intensity. i can hardly wait to see and feel their vibe. WOW![/quote]
He had on black doc marten type shoes. Nice black cargo pants... didn't catch any ankles though!
Posted:
08 Mar 2007 03:44
by juleverde
Tj - thanks for posting this.....I at last have a full-sized image for my desktop!
(although the photoshopping sucks. He's 64, for heaven's sake!! People need to deal with it!!)
Posted:
08 Mar 2007 16:50
by LisaK229
[b]STEWART ROCKS!!!![/b] Oh yes he does.
Look at him!!!