(Re) opening the "mysterious provenance" snare drum debate
Posted: 21 Sep 2011 14:08
It is mostly assumed that Stewart used a Pearl “Jupiter” model during the early days of the Police. However, here are some troubling facts:
1.- The Jupiter was a 1.5 chrome over brass (COB) shell with 3 grooves around it. Same thickness as the Tama SC signature snare.
2.- The other (COB) snare drum from Pearl since 1973 was a 1.0 shell , but had 2 grooves around it instead of 3.
3.- Until know, I have never seen a picture of SC (1978-1984) that you can clearly see the 3 grooves in the side of the snare.
4.- The only detailed picture I could find (in the 2007 tour book) was this, where you can see Stewart using the 2 groove snare drum (hence, NOT the Jupiter).
5.- I happen to own all three of those snares drums (Pearl Jupiter 1.5 mm. 3 grooves; Pearl “other model” 1.0 mm. 2 grooves; and Tama SC 1.5 mm.)
6.- The thing is that the Jupiter and the Tama SC are exactly the same in weight and pitch; but the problem is that the Pearl 2 grooves sounds closer to all five Police records.
Anyone?
1.- The Jupiter was a 1.5 chrome over brass (COB) shell with 3 grooves around it. Same thickness as the Tama SC signature snare.
2.- The other (COB) snare drum from Pearl since 1973 was a 1.0 shell , but had 2 grooves around it instead of 3.
3.- Until know, I have never seen a picture of SC (1978-1984) that you can clearly see the 3 grooves in the side of the snare.
4.- The only detailed picture I could find (in the 2007 tour book) was this, where you can see Stewart using the 2 groove snare drum (hence, NOT the Jupiter).
5.- I happen to own all three of those snares drums (Pearl Jupiter 1.5 mm. 3 grooves; Pearl “other model” 1.0 mm. 2 grooves; and Tama SC 1.5 mm.)
6.- The thing is that the Jupiter and the Tama SC are exactly the same in weight and pitch; but the problem is that the Pearl 2 grooves sounds closer to all five Police records.
Anyone?