by DirtyMartini on 05 Apr 2007 14:41
Don't worry, DM -- I seem to remember a thread of love for GitM, so there's plenty of affection out there. Some brilliant songs, but the overall sound of it just doesn't work for me. Similar to how hollo feels, I find the arrangements to be packed too damn tight, and you lose that lovely (and rather signature) openness that you get on the other albums. I think I prefer Synchronicity because there's more breathing room.
BUT I would absolutely place a pared-down version of GitM in heavy rotation. A lot of people complained about the horns during the GitM tour; for me it applies to the album as well. E.g., I LOVE "Hungry" and "Demo Man" -- great songs, great bass -- but because of the arrangements, I just never listen to them. I even tend to avoid "One World" despite SC's unbelievable work because it has that quality to it. But boil GitM down to bass, drums, guitar, and voice (and the "Magic" piano -- sorry Andy), and I'd be all over it.
[Note: I really like brass instruments, so I'm not hating on the horns section. There is just something about the quality of the 80s-brass-style-sound that doesn't sit well with my ears (not even back then). I adore Seger's "Turn the Page," but the opening notes of that saxophone make my fingers curl.]
Hollo, it's funny that you comment on "Rehumanize" because I *like* that the song is jarring and a bit messy cuz I find that it has a more organic quality than the preceding 4. That's one of the tunes in which I like the horns: the brass (mostly) fights *against* the 80s-brass sound (plus, mimicking sirens is cool) -- and many of SC's songs lean toward a slightly off quality that I enjoy. For me "TMI" is the low point on GitM; everything is clamoring for attention, which creates a mushy sound. (For the designers out there: if everything is bold, nothing is bold.)
But I absolutely agree that GitM is a transitional album. I love seeing The Boys experiment and change things up; I even like seeing Sting play with his new toys, even if I don't necessarily like the results. But I find that Andy -- and even Stewart -- tend to get lost in the arrangements. While I think Andy gets relegated to Solo Guy, I think Stewart tends to get pushed into the role of Timekeeper. And one of the reasons that I fell in love with The Police was because the drummer was a musician rather than a metronome. It's hard to find his brilliant details and subtleties underneath all the other stuff on GitM. Like Kim said, for me GitM is a bit too Sting.
I think one of the extraordinary things about the 5 albums is watching the band grow up and mature through the years. I agree with W&S that I'd use Regatta as an intro -- it crystallizes the sound and has less of the punk-for-punk's sake quality (not dissing Outlandos -- is a wonderful album) but it still has that newness to it, that bright-eyed hint of "Holy shit we can get paid doing this?" excitement. I think Zenyatta is where you start to see the band "grow up" -- which is inevitable and not a bad thing. Some of my favorite melodies come off that album. My only complaint with Zenyatta (and I know the rush to release was an issue) is that so many of the tunes feel abbreviated and under-developed, like they're snippets but not quite songs. That album leaves me frustrated for more.
Although unlike W&S, I like when Sting pulls out the literary allusions. For me the lyrics get bloated when he trades in subtlety for the clue hammer. There's a fine line between socially conscious and (as W&S suggested) preachy/cheesey -- just like there's a fine line between trying to be profound and actually being it -- and sometimes I don't think he quite finds the balance. Sting has an amazing facility with language when he's really got his subtlety muscles working.
As live arrangements go (as hollo mentioned), all the rules change: The Boys really shine live and bring their tunes to a-whole-nother level. I think one of the reasons I like the melodies from Zenyatta so much is because so many came from their live jams. Unlike most studio bands, these guys can REALLY play, and I think they play best when together in front of an audience: they've got the audience to stroke their egos and their sense of competition, but they've got each other (as I said elsewhere for Sting) to reign each other in, psych each other up, and kick each other's ass.
Good gods. Am I still talking? Sorry. I'll shut up now. Jeesh.
Dramatic highlights & a unique musical cosmos. Guaranteed.