Yeah, the methodology is flawed as hell and some of the results are pretty questionable. Rich barely even competes really. More than the results, I'd be really curious to hear some of the conversation and argument that went into the decisions made.
I'm with you on Ringo v. Weinberg; with Gadd v. Moon, though, I dunno. There is no definition of "modern popular music" provided, so what exactly these drummers are said to have an influence on is hard to say and makes a difference in my mind. If the endgame is, say, Slipknot, then okay, my money's on Moon. But Gadd's resume is so ridiculously long and varied -- I mean, damn:
http://www.drstevegadd.com/discography.htm -- that in the 70s especially, it seems you couldn't turn on your radio w/o running into him. In addition to being straight-up talented, he has had a hand in just so much -- especially so much popular, radio-played music whose sound was then imitated -- I can easily see an argument that he helped shape the sound of a genre. But again, as "modern popular music" goes, well, depends on what we mean by that.
Dramatic highlights & a unique musical cosmos. Guaranteed.