OT CA taxpayers be ready to grab your ankles....

OT CA taxpayers be ready to grab your ankles....

Postby irishrose1969 on 12 Feb 2009 03:06

Forgive me This is a Huge Rant...sorry.

OH good lord and I thought I had seen it all. This woman who had IVF procedure and had octuplets in CA when she had 6 other children has gone off the deep end and has created a website asking for money and donations for her babies and children.

Disgusting I tell you. WTF was she thinking. She wasn't I know. This woman abuses her moms livelyhood to care for the 6 she already has. I watched her interview last night and she says she will be able to afford them once she gets her degree and has no income at the present time. :evil: :shock: :evil:

Now I see that the CA taxpayers may have to front the bill for these babies.

OUTRAGEOUS!
Proud Flagbearer Vegas 08
It is fun to be on Stewart Copeland's Wall.
User avatar
irishrose1969
 
Posts: 1900
Joined: 01 Feb 2007 00:23
Location: Copelandia... My Happy Place!!

Postby themudderqueen on 18 Feb 2009 08:07

Wow - I though I was alread pissed! Then I accidently erased my whole rant and have to write it again!

Did you see there is another woman currently hospitalized in LA for the next THREE months at taxpayers' expense? She is expecting quadruplets because this SAME doctor implanted SEVEN embryos in her. (By the way, just the octuplet's post-natal care has been estimated at 1.3 million).

The Ca. welfare system is a MESS. Welfare mothers collect for every additional child they have, and mothers who give birth to drug-addicted babies just keep poppin' 'em out because it is "their civil right" to bear children. I used to help a neighbor who provided emergency foster care for drug-addicted infants. One infant, whom she eventually adopted, had EIGHT siblings - all born addicted to meth, all ending up in the foster care and medi-cal system. Yet I am going to lose services for my disabled daughter at the end of the month - whether the budget passes or not; I just won't lose ALL of them if it does pass - because the powers that be have targeted services for the disabled and elderly as the best opportunity to cut expenses. Guess they just don't fall into any civil rights lawyer's pro-bono fund, and God knows, their families are already coping with more than they can already.

So I MIGHT feel a little sheepish for the rant :oops: - but not too much. and thank you, irishrose for giving me this opportunity to blow off steam. :evil: :x :? :( :) :D
We are, each of us, Angels - with only one wing. We must embrace each other to fly.
User avatar
themudderqueen
 
Posts: 290
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 11:48
Location: So Cal

Postby themudderqueen on 20 Feb 2009 18:25

Oh - it gets even BETTER! Apparently, the home in which the mother of 14 planned to live with her parents is in foreclosure, $23,000 in back payments, and due to be auctioned in May. Now I'm almost beginning to hope the b***h manages to rake in all the money she's asking for in donations (can you BELIEVE that?!); otherwise the state's going to be paying for upkeep for all 17 members of that family. That doctor needs to lose his own cajones.
We are, each of us, Angels - with only one wing. We must embrace each other to fly.
User avatar
themudderqueen
 
Posts: 290
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 11:48
Location: So Cal

Postby irishrose1969 on 22 Feb 2009 17:48

Seriously, these people are freaking idiots. I mean come on. This doctor is only interested in "doing business" and has no care or concern about the health, welfare, or financial well being for these babies. Idiot needs to have license revoked permanently, put in prision so he cannot do these kinds of horrible procedures. He needs to be held accountable financially as well.

It makes me sick people who have babies, only for a check. Its one thing if you really need the help and are on assistance because you lost a job or something devastating happened. But to just collect a check cuz you only want $$. Disgusting. Its all about $$, what about loving your family come on? The people who really need the help are having to wait cuz your scamming the system.

These mothers who have drug problems and keep having these babies. Sorry, take the kids, sterilize the moms so they don't keep bringing innocent babies into the world under such horrible and sad circumstances.

I worked one of my first jobs at a bowling alley in their childcare area. This one woman was a foster mom to 8 babies over a year time frame who were all addicted to some drug or born with fetal alcohol syndrome.
IT was alot of work and alot of stress. That 2 hours was like an eternity. I had to constantly hold and console and they cried the entire time. They were in pain, shaking and miserable. I felt was heartbroken and nothing I did could help them. Eventually word got out about the woman bringing these babies out and she lost them.
Proud Flagbearer Vegas 08
It is fun to be on Stewart Copeland's Wall.
User avatar
irishrose1969
 
Posts: 1900
Joined: 01 Feb 2007 00:23
Location: Copelandia... My Happy Place!!

Postby themudderqueen on 22 Feb 2009 18:22

I know exactly what you mean about those poor babies. It is HORRIFYING, how much pain and anguish they feel - and the only thing that usually comforts a baby - holding them - is the WORST thing you can do for them. I personally feel that any woman who gives birth to a drug-addicted baby should be required to wear a norpatch - that birth control devise that is implanted just under the skin of you arm. It lasts as long as five years. If, two years later, that woman remains clean, she can have it removed. Another offense? Permanent sterilization. It just GALLS me that women can gestationaly abuse their children in all kinds of horrible ways "because it's their right to procreate", but those unborn children have no rights at all, apparently. I know it sounds like a cliche, but every other "important" aspect of human life, medical care, protection, finances, etc. have a least SOME sort of parameters and legal oversight. Having babies? Nada. Having babies responsibly, even less. I agree that the doctor involved should absolutely lose his lisence. Before this debacle, I guess I just assumed there was some sort of oversight to all this in vitro stuff - even just common sense, for God's sake. People should feel compelled, even if they're not required, to have children only if they are willing and able to support them. To have WADS of children when they can't - that's just insanity. And where and how she has been collecting all this $2400 a month for disability payments for 3 of those kids is beyond me; I've had a disabled child for 19 years, and she was not eligible for government support until she was 18. Oh, wait - maybe that's because she has a parent who was able and willing to support her instead of spending $100,000 to have even MORE kids (who will most CERTAINLY) have some level of disability. This state just passed a budget that GOUGES disability services. To see this selfish, attention-seeking female get even a dime of that to take care of those children makes me livid. I honestly think they would all be better off finding good foster homes - the few that exist because they really care about children, not because they want to make money. What a mess - and at the cost of the most helpless members of society. :(
We are, each of us, Angels - with only one wing. We must embrace each other to fly.
User avatar
themudderqueen
 
Posts: 290
Joined: 18 Jun 2007 11:48
Location: So Cal


Return to THE KRYPTON FORUM

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests

cron